e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 02/05/2012
 "Afghan concern about Pak is legitimate" - Gen. Petraeus

The Associated Press
09/01/2010
By

[Printer Friendly Version]

KABUL - President Hamid Karzai’s recent complaints that international forces should focus on militant leaders hiding in neighboring Pakistan instead of Afghan villages doesn’t mean the government no longer supports the US war strategy, the top NATO commander said Tuesday. Gen David Petraeus said he shared Karzai’s concern about threats across the border in Pakistan but said the Pakistanis deserve credit for waging what he described as an “impressive counterinsurgency campaign” during the past 18 months.

The Karzai government has been increasingly vocal in recent days about the need to destroy Taleban and al-Qaeda sanctuaries in Pakistan. Afghan National Security Adviser Rangin Dadfar Spanta has argued that US support of Pakistan amounts to nurturing the terrorists’ “main mentor” and that the Afghan people are no longer ready to “pay the price for the international community’s miscalculation and naivety.” “Given the very clear linkage between attacks on Afghan soil by individuals who have come from Pakistan and are commanded and controlled from Pakistan, I think President Karzai and Dr. Spanta have very legitimate concerns,” Petraeus said. Still, he added, the Pakistani government has continued to “squeeze the locations in which these individuals have safe haven sanctuary, recognizing that more work needs to be done.”

In a wide-ranging interview, Petraeus also said that Karzai’s efforts to reconcile with top Taleban leaders are “beyond the surface, but they are certainly in the early stages.” “He is the one who is pursuing this, but there have been some ways that we have facilitated some of the contact,” Petraeus said. The general said it’s natural that the Afghan government wants to take more of a lead role in the handling of its own national affairs. He said he’s seeking clarification on the blunt criticism from Afghan governmental officials, but does not think the comments reflect diminished Afghan support for his counterinsurgency strategy, which aims to provide security and earn the trust of the Afghan people. “Over time, I think it is very understandable — as was the case in Iraq as well — to see our host nation partners want to take the lead, want to be more prominent,” he said. Petraeus said he has drafted operational guidelines to implement Karzai’s goal of having Afghan police and soldiers take the lead in the country’s 34 provinces by 2014 as security allows. It remains unclear whether the Afghans will be ready to handle their own security, even four years down the road. “These guidelines recognize that this is a process, not an event,” he said. “It will typically represent a thinning out of ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) forces not a hand-off per se.”

Back to Top



Other Stories:


Driven Away by a War, Now Stalked by Winter’s Cold
The New York Times (02/04/2012)

Civilians among 49 killed in Helmand
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

U.S.-Held Taliban as Bargaining Chips Draw Republican Criticism
Bloomberg (02/03/2012)

Adios Afghanistan
Fox News (02/03/2012)

Snowfall, rains to end drought, hope growers
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

No winners in Afghanistan’s war
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

Plan for early end to US combat role catches Afghan officials by surprise
The Christian Science Monitor (02/03/2012)

Premature Evacuation?
Foreign Policy (02/03/2012)

Panetta comment prompts questions, concerns in Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

The administration’s muddled message on Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

Panetta Draws Fire Over Afghan Shift
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

NATO members rattled by U.S. combat plan on Afghanistan
The Los Angeles Times (02/03/2012)

The Taliban who may leave Gitmo
CNN (02/03/2012)

Afghanistan fears early US pull-out
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

'This terrible war could have ended in a month’
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

U.S. tries to ease confusion over Afghan plans
Reuters (02/03/2012)

'Substantial’ British troop pull-out from Afghanistan planned for early 2013
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

In winding down war, a fundamentally different challenge in Afghanistan than in Iraq
The Washington Post (02/03/2012)

To the Afghan Exits
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
The New York Times (02/03/2012)

50pc of US aid to be used in 2 years: Zakhilwal
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

Is Israel preparing to attack Iran?
Reuters (02/02/2012)

Plan to scale back U.S. Afghan role worries, surprises
Reuters (02/02/2012)

U.S., NATO seek to clarify Panetta comments on ending Afghan mission
The Washington Post (02/02/2012)

Courting Disaster In Afghanistan
The Weekly Standard (02/02/2012)

The Hard Way Out of Afghanistan
The New York Times (02/02/2012)

"Peace with Honour" is Another Way of Saying Defeat
The Huffington Post (02/02/2012)

The Empire’s graveyard
Khaleej Times (02/02/2012)

Sacrifices in vain on the Afghanistan war path
ABC (02/02/2012)

Reading the Taliban
The Economist (02/02/2012)


Back to Top