e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 09/03/2010
 There's marijuana in their socks

The Economist
11/21/2006
By

[Printer Friendly Version]

Afghanistan's auxiliary police

KNOWN as “thieves in uniform”, the standing of the Afghan police in the eyes of most residents of the southern province of Kandahar is just below that of the despised stray dogs. Their habit of turning roadside checkpoints into extortion rackets is just one blatant example of their criminality and corruption. The police force is one reason why, five years this week since the austere and brutal regime of the Taliban was overthrown, so many people in Kandahar cannot decide whom they hate more: the new government or the Taliban revivalists fighting it.

In the battered police station at Punjwai, where heavy fighting against the Taliban has dragged on for five months, police morale could not be lower. Over a frugal lunch of bread and dripping, the local commander, Bismillah Jan, says the Taliban would kill them if they went home, so they stay at the station day and night. Their pay, $70 a month, barely supports them, they are few in number, and equipment and training are dismal, with only 20 guns for 110 policemen in the district.

The police's disarray has left a law-and-order vacuum across southern Afghanistan, which the Taliban and local warlords have been quick to fill. Now the government of Hamid Karzai is attempting a risky solution. The first “auxiliary policemen” are training. Unlike regulars, recruited and trained centrally, these will be local men. The aim is rapidly to increase police numbers from, typically, about 50 in each district to several hundred. They will be paid the same as regular policemen.

Punjwai, which will get 300 of the new police, shows how badly they are needed. In September a big NATO offensive, Operation Medusa, supposedly cleared out the Taliban. But since there were so few police, and NATO's soldiers were tied up protecting two road projects, the Taliban soon reoccupied much of the ground.

There are big dangers in building up the “auxiliary” force. It might become the tool of a tribal faction or local warlord. The idea is to recruit what is in essence a local security force, but with a broad enough base to ensure that the government is not merely supplying, training and arming existing militias. Careful screening of the recruits is supposed to maintain the tribal balance and keep out unsavoury elements. In Kandahar, only 109 out of 200 initial volunteers were accepted.

Even so, the new recruits failed to impress Nasrullah Zarifi, who commands the main police-training centre in Kandahar. “These people have destroyed my training centre,” fumes the general. “They are just criminal people. Do we want quality or just to extend the numbers?”

General Zarifi says he threw six men off the course for propagating Taliban ideology, and expelled several more after finding marijuana in their socks. Some recruits rioted after deciding that their beds aligned their feet with Mecca while they slept. With pay and conditions so poor, it is not surprising that the force fails to attract top-notch candidates, and training only lasts ten days, compared with eight weeks for regular police. More worrying are reports that recruits in several districts came disproportionately from one tribe.

 Conscious that local warlords might try to co-opt the new recruits, Kandahar's provincial police chief is planning to create joint stations covering two or three districts. The auxiliaries will work under the main police command not local police commanders, and form what he calls “a mobile reserve”. It is an intriguing idea, but hardly what was originally envisaged.



Back to Top


Other Stories:


Life in Talibanistan - Part One: Throw these infidels in jail
Asia Times (09/03/2010)

The disconnect between pipelines and transparency
Globe and Mail, Canada (09/03/2010)

Of women, cosmetics & electioneering
Pajhwok (09/03/2010)

Karzai orders huge shakeup in Ministry of Interior
Pajhwok (09/03/2010)

Afghan banker warns of 'revolution'
United Press International (09/03/2010)

Karzai tells Afghans not to panic in rush for withdrawals
The Washington Post (09/03/2010)

What Led Kabul To Sack Ambassador To U.S.?
RFE/RL (09/02/2010)

Karzai's brother calls for U.S. to shore up Kabul Bank as withdrawals accelerate
The Washington Post (09/02/2010)

Interviews With Said Jawad, Afghan Ambassador To U.S
CNN, The Situation Room (09/02/2010)

Afghans Pull Money From Weakened Bank
The New York Times (09/02/2010)

Afghan finance minister: "Every penny of the deposits would be guaranteed by the government"
The Associated Press (09/02/2010)

Lessons in Crony Capitalism
The Huffington Post (09/02/2010)

Too Corrupt to Fail?
The New Yorker (09/02/2010)

A.Q. Khan
Newsweek (09/02/2010)

'It's premature to begin pulling troops' from Afghanistan, says Greg Mortenson
Pioneer Press (09/02/2010)

Lonq queues at Afghan bank amid corruption claims
AFP (09/02/2010)

14 Candidates Removed from Parliamentary Elections List
Tolo News (09/02/2010)

Few signs of run on Afghanistan's Kabul Bank
The Associated Press (09/02/2010)

Nervous Afghans pull money from Kabul Bank, raising fears
The Washington Post (09/02/2010)

Afghan ambassador to US to leave post, slams smears
AFP (09/01/2010)

Afghanistan takes over biggest private bank to avert collapse
AFP (09/01/2010)

Karzai in panic as graft probe closes in
Global Post (09/01/2010)

Where Did The Money Go?
Yahoo News (09/01/2010)

Afghanistan's biggest bank in near disastrous collapse
World News (09/01/2010)

After Obama's Iraq Speech, Afghans Worry About U.S. Commitment
TIME (09/01/2010)

Afghan Police's Lack of Guns and Gas Shows U.S. Exit Plan Flaw
Bloomberg (09/01/2010)

"Afghan concern about Pak is legitimate" - Gen. Petraeus
The Associated Press (09/01/2010)

Birthplace of the Taliban: the next battleground
The Associated Press (09/01/2010)

Afghan Ambassador Said T. Jawad leaving his post in Washington
The Washington Post (09/01/2010)

Afghanistan bomb attacks kill twenty-one US soldiers in 48 hours
The Telegraph (09/01/2010)


Back to Top