e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 02/05/2012
 Scenarios: Where is battle between Pakistan and Taliban headed?

Reuters
09/03/2010
By Michael Georgy

[Printer Friendly Version]

The struggle between Pakistan and militants has come under scrutiny again after U.S. charges against the Pakistani Taliban leader and renewed violence as the country struggles to cope with debilitating floods.

Here is how the battle between the government and al Qaeda-linked Sunni Pakistani Taliban insurgents may unfold.

NO CHANGES IN STRATEGY

The dynamics of the battle won't change, with the army mounting more offensives and the Taliban hitting back.

The military has said it scored major gains with a series of offensives over the last year that destroyed Taliban bases in strongholds in the northwest and killed many fighters.

It's hard to get independent confirmation of official death tolls, since militants often melt away before and during offensives to set up new strongholds, or plot their return.

Despite unprecedented crackdowns, the Taliban manage to carry out suicide bombings and attacks on police, security forces and soldiers, sometimes on high-profile military targets. The Taliban claimed responsibility for bombings in Lahore on Wednesday that killed at least 33 people and wounded 171. Militants may be encouraged to step up attacks because the government and military are preoccupied with flood relief efforts. There is the possibility of attacks on aid workers.

MORE TALIBAN ATTACKS OVERSEAS

U.S. prosecutors charged Pakistan Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud in the plot that killed seven CIA employees at an American base in Afghanistan last December.

Mehsud, believed to be hiding in the tribal areas of Pakistan, was charged with conspiracy to kill Americans overseas and conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction.

This suggests Pakistan's Taliban, which has for years focused on toppling the U.S.-backed government, has become more ambitious and extended its reach overseas.

Aside from the highly sophisticated operation against the CIA agents involving a Jordanian double agent, Pakistan's Taliban claimed responsibility for the bomb plot in New York's Times Square in May. It failed but raised alarm bells nonetheless.

The big question for Western intelligence agencies will be can the Pakistani Taliban stage major attacks in the United States and Europe?

It may have the determination to, but much will depend on whether it has the finances and connections to global militant groups. It may need deep cooperation with networks like al Qaeda with a track record of spectacular attacks.

THE US PUTS MORE PRESSURE ON PAKISTAN

Islamabad is already under immense U.S. pressure to eliminate Afghan Taliban militants who operate from sanctuaries on the Pakistan side of the border and cross to Afghanistan to attack American-led NATO troops. Now that Mehsud's profile has been raised by the U.S. charges, the U.S. may push Pakistan to fight the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani Taliban simultaneously.

Pakistan's government would almost certainly resist those demands and argue that the army is already stretched, especially since it has taken a lead role in providing relief to flood victims. The government is engaged in damage control after coming under fire for its inadequate response to the catastrophe and it has to deal with the staggering economic costs of the floods and victims who will surely demand massive compensation.

(Editing by Nick Macfie)

Back to Top



Other Stories:


Driven Away by a War, Now Stalked by Winter’s Cold
The New York Times (02/04/2012)

Civilians among 49 killed in Helmand
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

U.S.-Held Taliban as Bargaining Chips Draw Republican Criticism
Bloomberg (02/03/2012)

Adios Afghanistan
Fox News (02/03/2012)

Snowfall, rains to end drought, hope growers
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

No winners in Afghanistan’s war
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

Plan for early end to US combat role catches Afghan officials by surprise
The Christian Science Monitor (02/03/2012)

Premature Evacuation?
Foreign Policy (02/03/2012)

Panetta comment prompts questions, concerns in Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

The administration’s muddled message on Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

Panetta Draws Fire Over Afghan Shift
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

NATO members rattled by U.S. combat plan on Afghanistan
The Los Angeles Times (02/03/2012)

The Taliban who may leave Gitmo
CNN (02/03/2012)

Afghanistan fears early US pull-out
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

'This terrible war could have ended in a month’
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

U.S. tries to ease confusion over Afghan plans
Reuters (02/03/2012)

'Substantial’ British troop pull-out from Afghanistan planned for early 2013
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

In winding down war, a fundamentally different challenge in Afghanistan than in Iraq
The Washington Post (02/03/2012)

To the Afghan Exits
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
The New York Times (02/03/2012)

50pc of US aid to be used in 2 years: Zakhilwal
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

Is Israel preparing to attack Iran?
Reuters (02/02/2012)

Plan to scale back U.S. Afghan role worries, surprises
Reuters (02/02/2012)

U.S., NATO seek to clarify Panetta comments on ending Afghan mission
The Washington Post (02/02/2012)

Courting Disaster In Afghanistan
The Weekly Standard (02/02/2012)

The Hard Way Out of Afghanistan
The New York Times (02/02/2012)

"Peace with Honour" is Another Way of Saying Defeat
The Huffington Post (02/02/2012)

The Empire’s graveyard
Khaleej Times (02/02/2012)

Sacrifices in vain on the Afghanistan war path
ABC (02/02/2012)

Reading the Taliban
The Economist (02/02/2012)


Back to Top