e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 02/05/2012
 Afghan president asks why allies won't act on Pakistan

Reuters
07/29/2010
By David Fox

[Printer Friendly Version]

KABUL – Afghan President Hamid Karzai questioned on Thursday the willingness of his Western allies to strike insurgent bases in Pakistan given the strong evidence of Islamabad's support for the Taliban.

"The war against terrorism is not in the villages or houses of Afghanistan ... but in the sanctuaries, sources of funding and training (of terrorism), and they lie outside Afghanistan," he told a news conference in Kabul.

"It is a different question whether Afghanistan has the ability to tackle this," he said in response to a question about Pakistan support for the Taliban and why the conflict was dragging on. "... but our allies have this capability. The question now is 'why they are not taking action'?" Islamabad's covert backing of the Taliban resurfaced this week with the publication by the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks of tens of thousands of classified U.S. military documents related to the near-nine-year-old war.

The documents show current and former members of Pakistan's spy agency were actively collaborating with the Taliban in plotting attacks in Afghanistan -- including an assassination attempt against Karzai.

PAKISTAN KEY TO ENDING WAR

Those ties have been an open secret for a long time, but relations between Islamabad and Kabul have nevertheless warmed in the past two years. Both neighbors signed a long-awaited but lucrative trucking transit agreement last month, their first significant diplomatic accord in decades.

Karzai held out hope for further improved ties.

"Looking at the future, Afghanistan of course will continue its efforts for establishing friendly, stable and sturdy relations with all of its neighbors," he said in his first solo news conference in months.

Karzai needs the 150,000-strong NATO-led foreign force to make significant advances against the insurgency if his government is to meet a 2014 target of taking responsibility for security operations across the whole country.

Ordinary Afghans are baffled how Washington can wage a costly and punishing war against the Taliban in Afghanistan while at the same time giving billions in aid and military support to Pakistan, which allows sanctuary to militant leaders.

But Islamabad, which sees Afghanistan as "strategic depth" to the west in case of war with India to the east, will be central to any peace talks between the Karzai's government and the Taliban leadership over which it holds sway.

Karzai said he had ordered government agencies to sift through the WikiLeaks documents to see if there was anything new or damaging to nation, adding reports of Afghan confidential informants being identified were "irresponsible and shocking."

Many of the documents reveal names of Afghans giving information to foreign forces or informing on the Taliban and there are fears they could be identified and targeted by insurgents.

Violence in Afghanistan has soared since a troop surge brought to 150,000 the number of foreign forces confronting the Taliban and two other insurgent groups.

(Writing by David Fox; Editing by Miral Fahmy)

Back to Top



Other Stories:


Driven Away by a War, Now Stalked by Winter’s Cold
The New York Times (02/04/2012)

Civilians among 49 killed in Helmand
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

U.S.-Held Taliban as Bargaining Chips Draw Republican Criticism
Bloomberg (02/03/2012)

Adios Afghanistan
Fox News (02/03/2012)

Snowfall, rains to end drought, hope growers
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

No winners in Afghanistan’s war
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

Plan for early end to US combat role catches Afghan officials by surprise
The Christian Science Monitor (02/03/2012)

Premature Evacuation?
Foreign Policy (02/03/2012)

Panetta comment prompts questions, concerns in Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

The administration’s muddled message on Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

Panetta Draws Fire Over Afghan Shift
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

NATO members rattled by U.S. combat plan on Afghanistan
The Los Angeles Times (02/03/2012)

The Taliban who may leave Gitmo
CNN (02/03/2012)

Afghanistan fears early US pull-out
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

'This terrible war could have ended in a month’
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

U.S. tries to ease confusion over Afghan plans
Reuters (02/03/2012)

'Substantial’ British troop pull-out from Afghanistan planned for early 2013
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

In winding down war, a fundamentally different challenge in Afghanistan than in Iraq
The Washington Post (02/03/2012)

To the Afghan Exits
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
The New York Times (02/03/2012)

50pc of US aid to be used in 2 years: Zakhilwal
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

Is Israel preparing to attack Iran?
Reuters (02/02/2012)

Plan to scale back U.S. Afghan role worries, surprises
Reuters (02/02/2012)

U.S., NATO seek to clarify Panetta comments on ending Afghan mission
The Washington Post (02/02/2012)

Courting Disaster In Afghanistan
The Weekly Standard (02/02/2012)

The Hard Way Out of Afghanistan
The New York Times (02/02/2012)

"Peace with Honour" is Another Way of Saying Defeat
The Huffington Post (02/02/2012)

The Empire’s graveyard
Khaleej Times (02/02/2012)

Sacrifices in vain on the Afghanistan war path
ABC (02/02/2012)

Reading the Taliban
The Economist (02/02/2012)


Back to Top