e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 02/05/2012
 What Led Kabul To Sack Ambassador To U.S.?

RFE/RL
09/02/2010
By Ron Synovitz

[Printer Friendly Version]

Afghanistan's ambassador to the United States has been ordered to resign, after seven years in the post.

Said Jawad said he was not given any reason for why he must step down by September 22.

Afghan ambassador to US to leave post, slams smears
Afghan ambassador to the United States, Said Jawad, pictured in 2009.AFP/File
He told CNN television on September 1 that seven years as the ambassador was a "long time" and that it was "fairly normal" for him to be leaving at this point. But he also complained about a "broad smear campaign" in Kabul -- including the publication of photos alleged to have been taken at the Afghan Embassy in Washington during Ramadan.

He also said Afghan newspapers and websites that have republished the pictures were guilty of spreading "completely false allegations and doctored photos."

The photographs purportedly show women in sleeveless dresses drinking alcohol at the embassy. Jawad says he was traveling in Colombia and Brazil at the time the photos were alleged to have been taken.

No Scandal In Kabul

Jawad has also charged that he and other Afghans are being "subjected to a broad smear campaign" by both an "opportunistic government" in Kabul and "fanatics outside of the government" who use misinformation and propaganda as political tools.

Afghanistan's Foreign Ministry rejected reports that suggest Jawad's sacking was the result of the controversial photos. Ministry officials in Kabul told RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan the move was part of a "normal diplomatic rotation" and that Afghanistan's ambassadors to Moscow, Dubai, and Jordan had also been reassigned recently.

Jean MacKenzie, the Afghanistan bureau chief for the online GlobalPost news agency, says that there's no major domestic political scandal in Kabul about the photos that would make Jawad a liability in upcoming parliamentary elections.

"It's not something that people are talking about on every street corner," MacKenzie says. "So while it could be that there is a small contingent that regards Ambassador Jawad as a liability or is trying to smear him, as of now this has not reached critical mass in the consciousness of the Afghan people -- at least from the point of view of Kabul."

'Serious Differences'

Analysts say Jawad's outspoken opposition to Kabul's drive for peace talks with the Taliban may be the real reason he is being sacked.

Jawad has criticized the idea of negotiations with the Taliban leadership, arguing as recently as last year that the only "engagement" with senior Taliban leaders should be military confrontation.

Speaking to the Carnegie Endowment For International Peace in May 2009, he said that "the leadership of the Taliban" -- the Haqqani network, the Hekmatyar group, and Mullah Omar and the Quetta Shura -- "have been affiliated and associated with Al-Qaeda for a long time."

Jawad said that these groups "are conducting an ideological battle" and that for the "small group of the hard-core Taliban, the ideological Taliban, the type of engagement that is needed is military. We have to engage them. We have to take them out. There is no other option."

MacKenzie says that those views, at a time when Kabul is warming to the idea of Taliban peace talks, may be a reason for Jawad's dismissal.

She says that "Jawad's position would be at odds with the prevailing wisdom in Kabul now. Negotiations with the Taliban are on the table. They are being openly discussed. The United States, contrary to its previous position, is not rejecting out-of-hand the possibility of political negotiations with the Taliban."

She says there would be "serious differences" between Jawad's opinion as expressed in his 2009 speech and "what is now becoming mainstream political wisdom in Kabul."

Anti-Western Tide?

Ahmad Sayeedi, a former diplomat who served as Afghanistan's deputy council in Pakistan, says that many people in Afghan diplomatic circles think there has been a smear campaign to discredit Jawad.

Sayeedi says politicians and diplomats with long-standing ties to the United States have come under pressure from Kabul in the past year as relations between Washington and Karzai have soured.

"Currently, the political situation in Afghanistan is such that people who are close to the United States face all kinds of difficulties," Sayeedi says.

Indeed, Karzai in the last few months has forced the resignations of Afghanistan's interior minister and secret service chief, two of the most respected members -- at home and among Afghanistan's Western allies -- of Karzai's U.S.-backed government.

Both also reportedly had serious reservations about Karzai's approach to brokering peace talks with the Taliban. Karzai's office said in early June that the president lost confidence in the officials because of their handling of security at a "peace jirga" in Kabul that was targeted by a Taliban attack.

Contributors to this report include RFE/RL correspondent Farangis Najibullah in Prague and RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan.

Back to Top



Other Stories:


Driven Away by a War, Now Stalked by Winter’s Cold
The New York Times (02/04/2012)

Civilians among 49 killed in Helmand
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

U.S.-Held Taliban as Bargaining Chips Draw Republican Criticism
Bloomberg (02/03/2012)

Adios Afghanistan
Fox News (02/03/2012)

Snowfall, rains to end drought, hope growers
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

No winners in Afghanistan’s war
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

Plan for early end to US combat role catches Afghan officials by surprise
The Christian Science Monitor (02/03/2012)

Premature Evacuation?
Foreign Policy (02/03/2012)

Panetta comment prompts questions, concerns in Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

The administration’s muddled message on Afghanistan
The Washington Post, Editorial (02/03/2012)

Panetta Draws Fire Over Afghan Shift
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

NATO members rattled by U.S. combat plan on Afghanistan
The Los Angeles Times (02/03/2012)

The Taliban who may leave Gitmo
CNN (02/03/2012)

Afghanistan fears early US pull-out
The Financial Times (02/03/2012)

'This terrible war could have ended in a month’
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

U.S. tries to ease confusion over Afghan plans
Reuters (02/03/2012)

'Substantial’ British troop pull-out from Afghanistan planned for early 2013
Telegraph (02/03/2012)

In winding down war, a fundamentally different challenge in Afghanistan than in Iraq
The Washington Post (02/03/2012)

To the Afghan Exits
The Wall Street Journal (02/03/2012)

Romney Criticizes Afghan Pullout Plan, but Obama Is Eager for the Debate
The New York Times (02/03/2012)

50pc of US aid to be used in 2 years: Zakhilwal
Pajhwok (02/03/2012)

Is Israel preparing to attack Iran?
Reuters (02/02/2012)

Plan to scale back U.S. Afghan role worries, surprises
Reuters (02/02/2012)

U.S., NATO seek to clarify Panetta comments on ending Afghan mission
The Washington Post (02/02/2012)

Courting Disaster In Afghanistan
The Weekly Standard (02/02/2012)

The Hard Way Out of Afghanistan
The New York Times (02/02/2012)

"Peace with Honour" is Another Way of Saying Defeat
The Huffington Post (02/02/2012)

The Empire’s graveyard
Khaleej Times (02/02/2012)

Sacrifices in vain on the Afghanistan war path
ABC (02/02/2012)

Reading the Taliban
The Economist (02/02/2012)


Back to Top